The Reason Why More And More Adults Are Cutting Ties With Their Families, According to Research

Family relationships are often considered some of the strongest bonds people will ever have. However, research suggests that a growing conversation about respect, personal boundaries, and emotional well-being is changing how many adults think about their relationships with parents, siblings, and other relatives.

For generations, people were taught that family should come before everything else. Regardless of disagreements, hurt feelings, or past experiences, maintaining relationships with relatives was often seen as a responsibility rather than a choice.

Today, that traditional understanding of family is being challenged. Some adults are choosing to limit communication with relatives, while others are ending relationships entirely.

The practice, commonly known as family estrangement, has attracted considerable attention in recent years. Social media discussions, television programs, and relationship experts have all explored why some people decide to distance themselves from their families.

Although estrangement is sometimes portrayed as a growing social crisis, researchers suggest the reality is more complicated.

Studies indicate that family separation is relatively common, but there is little evidence showing that it has suddenly increased. Instead, changing expectations about relationships may help explain why estrangement has become such a widely discussed subject.

Research Shows Family Estrangement Is More Common Than Many Realize

Family estrangement occurs when relatives intentionally reduce or end contact with one another. It can involve parents and adult children, siblings, grandparents, or other extended family members.

Unlike temporary disagreements, estrangement generally involves a longer-lasting disruption in communication or emotional connection.

Research suggests that millions of Americans have experienced some form of separation from a family member.

A study published in the Journal of Marriage and Family in 2022 examined nationally representative data on relationships between parents and their adult children.

Researchers found that approximately 26% of adult children experienced a period of estrangement from their fathers, while around 6% experienced estrangement from their mothers during the period studied.

Another national survey, conducted by Cornell University sociologist Karl Pillemer in 2020, produced similarly significant findings.

That research estimated that roughly 27% of Americans were estranged from at least one family member, representing approximately 67 million people at the time.

These findings suggest that family estrangement is far from unusual.

However, the numbers do not necessarily mean that family relationships are deteriorating faster than they once did.

Researchers have not established a reliable historical trend showing that estrangement rates are rapidly increasing. Without comparable long-term measurements, it is difficult to determine whether more families are separating or whether people have simply become more willing to discuss their experiences.

Why Family Relationships Are Changing

One possible explanation for modern family tensions involves changing expectations about how relatives should treat one another.

Traditionally, family relationships were often built around duty, loyalty, and respect for authority.

Parents were expected to guide their children, while children were expected to respect their parents, even after reaching adulthood.

These expectations were reinforced by religious traditions, cultural values, and social pressures.

However, modern relationships increasingly emphasize personal autonomy, emotional support, and mutual respect.

Many adults now believe that being related to someone does not automatically guarantee an unlimited right to participate in their lives.

Instead, they may expect family members to demonstrate the same consideration, accountability, and respect that they would expect from friends or romantic partners.

This difference in expectations can create serious disagreements.

For example, one relative may believe that maintaining family unity requires overlooking past conflicts. Another may feel that a healthy relationship cannot continue without acknowledging harmful behavior and making meaningful changes.

When neither person is willing to reconsider their position, the relationship can gradually become more difficult to maintain.

Family Estrangement Often Develops Over Time

Although estrangement is sometimes associated with a single dramatic event, research suggests that many family separations develop gradually.

In research involving 68 in-depth interviews with adults who had ended contact with relatives, participants frequently described relationships that had become increasingly difficult over time.

Some reported painful childhood experiences, including mistreatment or abuse.

However, difficult childhood experiences were not always identified as the immediate reason for ending contact.

Instead, many participants emphasized ongoing problems in their adult relationships.

These problems included repeated disagreements, unresolved conflicts, a perceived lack of accountability, and difficulty establishing personal boundaries.

For some individuals, attempts to improve communication were unsuccessful. Others believed that their relatives were unwilling or unable to recognize their concerns.

Over time, continued conflict could make maintaining the relationship feel emotionally exhausting.

This suggests that estrangement is not always about refusing to forgive something that happened years earlier.

In many cases, it reflects ongoing disagreements about how family members should interact in the present.

Researchers have described these competing expectations as a conflict between different understandings of what family relationships should involve.

Two Very Different Ideas About Family

One of the most important findings from research on estrangement involves the existence of two contrasting approaches to family relationships.

The first emphasizes permanent obligations based on biological relationships.

Under this traditional approach, relatives are expected to remain connected because of their shared family identity.

Parents, children, and siblings may disagree, but their responsibilities toward one another are considered enduring.

This perspective is sometimes described as compulsory kinship.

It reflects the belief that family relationships carry obligations that cannot easily be abandoned.

The second approach places greater importance on the quality of the relationship itself.

Rather than assuming that family connections must continue regardless of circumstances, this perspective emphasizes respect, cooperation, emotional safety, and mutual support.

Researchers refer to this model as democratized kinship.

Under this understanding, family relationships are maintained through the behavior of the people involved, rather than through biological connections alone.

Neither perspective is entirely new.

Throughout history, people have disagreed about the responsibilities that relatives owe one another.

However, these contrasting beliefs can become particularly noticeable when different generations or family members hold opposing expectations.

One person may view family loyalty as unconditional, while another believes that continued contact should depend on how they are treated.

When these differences remain unresolved, estrangement can become a possible outcome.

Marriage Offers an Interesting Comparison

Changes in attitudes toward marriage provide a useful way to understand how expectations about family relationships can evolve.

Historically, marriage was frequently treated as a lifelong institution shaped by economic necessity, religion, social expectations, and legal restrictions.

Ending a marriage was often difficult, particularly for women who lacked independent financial resources or faced significant social consequences.

Over time, expectations changed.

Marriage increasingly came to be understood as a partnership that should provide affection, emotional support, fairness, and personal fulfillment.

Sociologists including Andrew Cherlin, Anthony Giddens, and Stephanie Coontz have examined how these changing expectations influenced modern relationships.

As people began placing greater importance on the quality of their marriages, remaining together solely because of tradition became less universally accepted.

A similar shift may be occurring in relationships between adult children and their relatives.

Rather than treating family connections as permanent regardless of circumstances, some adults evaluate whether those relationships contribute positively to their lives.

This does not mean that family obligations have disappeared.

Instead, it suggests that expectations about the responsibilities and benefits of family membership are becoming more varied.

Smaller Families May Make Estrangement More Significant

Another factor influencing the consequences of family estrangement is the declining number of children born in the United States.

Families today are generally smaller than those of previous generations.

When parents have fewer children, the loss of contact with even one adult child can have a greater impact on the family’s overall relationships.

For example, a parent with several children may still maintain strong connections with other family members if one relationship becomes strained.

In a family with only one child, estrangement can mean losing the primary parent-child relationship altogether.

Smaller family networks may also affect practical matters, including caregiving, financial assistance, and emotional support during difficult periods.

As people grow older, adult children often become important sources of help with transportation, medical appointments, household responsibilities, and daily activities.

When these relationships break down, both generations may face additional challenges.

Consequently, even if estrangement is not becoming more common, its effects may be particularly significant in smaller families.

Technology Has Changed Family Communication

Modern technology has also transformed expectations surrounding family contact.

In previous generations, relatives who lived far apart might have communicated through occasional letters or telephone calls.

Today, smartphones, messaging applications, and social media make it possible to remain connected throughout the day.

Although these technologies offer important benefits, they can also create pressure to respond frequently.

Some family members may interpret unanswered messages or missed calls as signs of disrespect or rejection.

Others may feel overwhelmed by repeated attempts to communicate.

For adults who are trying to establish distance from difficult family relationships, constant digital accessibility can make maintaining boundaries more challenging.

Research on mobile communication has explored how technology can reinforce expectations of ongoing availability among family members.

This means that physical distance does not necessarily create the same separation it once did.

Even relatives living hundreds of miles apart can remain involved in each other’s daily lives through digital communication.

Family Obligations Can Extend Beyond Emotional Relationships

The expectation that relatives should care for one another is not limited to cultural traditions.

In some parts of the United States, it is also reflected in legislation.

According to the National Conference of State Legislatures, 27 states have laws commonly described as filial responsibility laws.

These laws can establish financial responsibilities for adult children concerning certain needs of their parents, although their requirements, exceptions, and enforcement vary significantly by state.

The existence of these laws illustrates how family obligations can extend beyond personal feelings.

Society has historically treated family relationships as important sources of support, particularly for older adults.

However, legal responsibilities and emotional relationships are not necessarily the same thing.

An adult may feel disconnected from a parent while still facing certain practical or legal obligations.

This distinction highlights the complexity of family estrangement and why it cannot always be understood as a purely personal decision.

Cutting Contact Does Not Always Mean Rejecting Family

One of the more interesting findings from research on estrangement is that adults who distance themselves from biological relatives do not necessarily abandon the idea of family.

Instead, some develop new support networks that fulfill many of the same emotional and practical roles.

These networks may include close friends, romantic partners, neighbors, in-laws, or other trusted individuals.

Researchers sometimes describe these relationships as chosen families.

The concept has existed for generations, particularly within communities where people have relied on supportive relationships outside their families of origin.

Recent research based on interviews with estranged adults suggests that separation from relatives can sometimes lead individuals to reconsider how they define family.

Rather than focusing exclusively on biological relationships, they may build connections around trust, shared experiences, emotional support, and reliability.

This process has been described as redoing family.

For some people, these new relationships become important sources of companionship and belonging.

However, creating a chosen family does not necessarily eliminate the emotional difficulties associated with estrangement.

The loss of contact with relatives can still involve grief, uncertainty, loneliness, and complicated feelings.

Experiences vary considerably depending on the circumstances surrounding the separation.

Estrangement Does Not Have to Be Permanent

Although family estrangement can involve years without communication, it is not always a permanent arrangement.

Some relatives eventually reconnect after circumstances change or disagreements are addressed.

Others maintain limited contact rather than returning to their previous level of involvement.

Reconciliation may depend on several factors, including whether both parties are willing to communicate, acknowledge concerns, and establish realistic expectations.

In some cases, rebuilding a relationship may require changes in behavior rather than simply agreeing to move past earlier disagreements.

However, reconciliation is not always possible or appropriate, particularly when serious mistreatment or safety concerns remain unresolved.

The important distinction is that family relationships can change over time.

Estrangement is not necessarily a single irreversible decision. It can involve periods of distance, renewed communication, and further adjustments as individuals reconsider their needs and circumstances.

What Research Reveals About the Future of Family Relationships

The growing public discussion surrounding family estrangement reflects broader questions about the meaning of family in modern society.

For some people, family represents a permanent bond that should survive disagreements, disappointment, and personal differences.

For others, family relationships are meaningful precisely because they involve mutual care, respect, and a willingness to support one another.

Research suggests that tensions often emerge when these expectations conflict.

Importantly, available evidence does not establish that family estrangement is rapidly increasing or that one generation is uniquely responsible for it.

Instead, studies reveal that separation from relatives is a relatively common experience influenced by complicated personal, social, and cultural factors.

Changing family sizes, modern communication technology, evolving relationship expectations, and differing ideas about personal responsibility may all shape how these conflicts develop.

Ultimately, the research points to a broader transformation in how some people understand family.

Biological relationships remain deeply important, but they are not the only connections capable of providing belonging, emotional security, and support.

For many adults, the central question is no longer simply whether family members should remain connected at all costs.

It is also whether those connections provide the respect, understanding, and care that allow relationships to remain healthy over time.

Featured image: Magnific

Friendly Note: FreeJupiter.com shares general information for curious minds. Please fact-check all claims and double-check health info with a qualified professional. Read our health-related content disclaimer here. 🌱

Joseph Brown
Joseph Brown

Joseph Brown is a science writer with a passion for the peculiar and extraordinary. At FreeJupiter.com, he delves into the strange side of science and news, unearthing stories that ignite curiosity. Whether exploring cutting-edge discoveries or the odd quirks of our universe, Joseph brings a fresh perspective that makes even the most complex topics accessible and intriguing.

Articles: 681