125-Year-Old Physics Puzzle Has Finally Been Cracked by Mathematicians

Sharing is caring!

A remarkable advancement has recently emerged from the world of mathematics, where researchers have addressed a fluid dynamics conundrum that has stood unresolved for more than 125 years. This achievement successfully integrates three foundational theories that describe how fluids move, providing a rigorous mathematical framework that connects the behavior of individual particles to the flow of fluids on a larger scale.

Revisiting a Visionary Challenge by David Hilbert

At the turn of the 20th century, the renowned mathematician David Hilbert presented a list of 23 profound problems designed to steer mathematical research for decades. Among these, the sixth problem was particularly ambitious: to establish a precise mathematical foundation for physics itself. Hilbert’s goal was to identify the minimal set of mathematical principles from which the laws of physics could be derived, effectively “axiomatizing” the physical sciences.

This problem remains one of the most challenging in the intersection of mathematics and physics, as it requires bridging abstract mathematical rigor with the complexity of physical phenomena. Over the past century, many have contributed incremental progress toward this goal, but a comprehensive solution has been elusive.

Linking Three Core Theories of Fluid Motion

In early 2025, mathematicians Yu Deng (University of Chicago), Zaher Hani, and Xiao Ma (University of Michigan) published a groundbreaking paper that claims to solve a critical piece of Hilbert’s sixth problem. Their research demonstrates a rigorous derivation connecting three key theories that describe fluid behavior at different scales.

These theories are essential in practical applications such as designing aircraft and forecasting weather, yet until now, their mathematical underpinnings were based on assumptions that lacked formal proof.

Read more: Recordings Showing Orcas Mimicking Human Speech is Freaking Listeners Out

Understanding the Three Perspectives on Fluids

Fluid motion can be understood through three complementary frameworks, each relevant at different scales:

• Microscopic Scale: At this level, fluids consist of countless particles whose movements follow Newton’s laws of motion. While precise, this particle-based view becomes impractical for large systems.
• Statistical Mechanics: Ludwig Boltzmann’s work in the late 19th century introduced a statistical approach, encapsulated in the Boltzmann equation, which describes the average behavior of particles in a fluid. This approach simplifies the complexity by focusing on probability distributions rather than tracking each particle.
• Macroscopic Scale: At the largest scale, fluids are treated as continuous media, ignoring their particulate nature. The Euler and Navier-Stokes equations govern this view, describing fluid flow and related physical properties crucial for engineering and physics.

Historically, these three frameworks have operated somewhat independently, with no rigorous mathematical proof linking them seamlessly.

The Mathematical Breakthrough Explained

Deng, Hani, and Ma’s work rigorously establishes the connections among these three descriptions. Their proof proceeds in two major steps:

1. From Newtonian Mechanics to the Boltzmann Equation: They show that the collective behavior of a large number of particles following Newton’s laws converges to the statistical description provided by Boltzmann’s kinetic theory. This step involves analyzing hard-sphere particles undergoing elastic collisions within a periodic domain, a mathematical construct akin to a torus.
2. From the Boltzmann Equation to Fluid Equations: Building on this foundation, they derive the macroscopic fluid equations-the compressible Euler equations and the incompressible Navier-Stokes-Fourier equations-that govern large-scale fluid flow.

This rigorous derivation overcomes a significant hurdle: accounting for the complex, cumulative effects of countless particle collisions over extended periods. The researchers introduced innovative mathematical techniques, including new combinatorial and integral estimation methods, to manage these intricate interactions.

Read more: Scientists Have Discovered A New Cannabis Compound Inside a Totally Different Plant

Why This Matters

This accomplishment represents a major milestone in mathematical physics. By providing a solid foundation for fluid dynamics equations, it enhances the reliability of models used in numerous scientific and engineering disciplines-from climate modeling to aerospace design.

Moreover, this work fulfills a key component of Hilbert’s vision by rigorously connecting microscopic physics with macroscopic phenomena through a clear mathematical pathway.

What Remains on the Horizon

Despite this breakthrough, Hilbert’s sixth problem in its entirety remains open. The broader challenge involves developing a complete axiomatic framework for all of physics, encompassing not only classical mechanics but also quantum theory and general relativity. The recent progress applies to classical fluids under idealized conditions, marking a significant but partial step toward the grand goal.

Related Insights and Further Reading on the Resolution of Hilbert’s Sixth Problem

The recent breakthrough in fluid dynamics, achieved by mathematicians Yu Deng, Zaher Hani, and Xiao Ma, represents a landmark step in addressing Hilbert’s sixth problem. To fully appreciate the significance and the broader context of this advance, it is valuable to explore related insights, critiques, and ongoing challenges that frame this achievement within the century-long quest to axiomatize physics.

The Scope and Vision of Hilbert’s Sixth Problem

Hilbert’s sixth problem, posed in 1900, calls for extending the axiomatic method of mathematics to physics, particularly by providing a rigorous mathematical foundation for physical theories. It is often interpreted as two interrelated challenges:

• Axiomatization of Probability: This part, largely resolved in the early 20th century, established a firm mathematical basis for probability theory, which underpins statistical mechanics.
• Derivation of Continuum Laws from Atomistic Models: The more profound and still active challenge is to rigorously derive macroscopic fluid equations-such as the Euler and Navier-Stokes equations-from the microscopic laws governing particles, specifically Newtonian mechanics, via kinetic theory (Boltzmann’s equation).

This program, sometimes called Hilbert’s program in this context, envisions a logical chain: starting from the fundamental laws of particle motion, passing through a statistical description of many particles, and culminating in the continuum equations that govern fluid flow.

The Recent Breakthrough: A Rigorous Mathematical Derivation

Deng, Hani, and Ma’s work rigorously completes this chain for a system of hard-sphere particles in periodic domains (mathematically modeled as tori in two and three dimensions). Their proof consists of two main steps:

1. From Newtonian Particle Dynamics to the Boltzmann Equation: They show that as the number of particles increases and their size decreases, the collective behavior converges to the statistical description given by Boltzmann’s kinetic theory.
2. From the Boltzmann Equation to Fluid Equations: Using hydrodynamic limits, they derive the compressible Euler and incompressible Navier-Stokes-Fourier equations, which describe fluid motion at macroscopic scales.

This achievement extends previous results by validating these derivations over longer timescales, a major technical hurdle that had limited earlier attempts.

Critical Perspectives and Remaining Challenges

Despite the mathematical rigor, some experts raise important conceptual and physical concerns about the completeness of this solution in fulfilling Hilbert’s original vision:

• Dilute Gas vs. Dense Fluid Paradox: The derivation applies to dilute gases, where particle volume fraction tends to zero, meaning the system does not fully capture the behavior of dense fluids. Dense fluids exhibit many-body interactions and phase transitions that are not represented in this framework.
• Molecular Chaos Assumption: The Boltzmann equation relies on the assumption of molecular chaos-statistical independence of particle velocities before collisions. This assumption breaks down in fluid-like regimes where particle correlations and recollisions become significant, raising questions about the physical realism of the derivation.

These critiques highlight that while the breakthrough is a major step in the classical domain of dilute gases, the full axiomatization of fluid dynamics for realistic dense fluids remains an open problem. Alternative approaches, such as extended kinetic models (e.g., Enskog theory) or frameworks incorporating stochastic and quantum effects, may be necessary to bridge this gap.

Broader Implications for Physics and Mathematics

This work not only advances fluid dynamics but also exemplifies the ongoing effort to unify different levels of physical description through rigorous mathematics. It strengthens the theoretical foundation for computational fluid dynamics (CFD), which relies heavily on the Euler and Navier-Stokes equations for simulations in engineering, meteorology, and environmental science.

Moreover, the research underscores the profound interplay between mathematics, physics, and philosophy. Hilbert’s sixth problem sits at this intersection, challenging researchers to reconcile microscopic particle mechanics with emergent macroscopic phenomena in a logically consistent manner.

Read more: Breakthrough Molecule May Treat Patients With Rare and Debilitating Mitochondrial Diseases

Future Directions and Open Questions

While the recent results mark a historic milestone, several avenues remain for exploration:

• Extending to Dense Fluids: Developing mathematical frameworks that accurately describe dense fluids and capture complex interactions beyond the dilute gas approximation.
• Quantum and Relativistic Extensions: Hilbert’s broader vision includes axiomatizing all physics, which involves integrating quantum mechanics and general relativity into a unified mathematical structure.
• Refining Kinetic Theories: Improving kinetic models to incorporate correlations, memory effects, and non-equilibrium phenomena to better approximate real fluids.
• Bridging Theory and Computation: Leveraging rigorous derivations to enhance numerical methods and simulations, thus improving predictive capabilities in applied sciences.